Our Methodology
Our commitment to transparency in how we gather, analyze, and present information is central to our mission.
Our content begins with in-depth research. We prioritize primary sources, academic publications, official government documents, and reputable news organizations. For historical pieces, we consult archival materials and expert historians.
Information is cross-referenced from multiple sources to ensure accuracy and comprehensiveness.
Sources are clearly cited where appropriate, allowing readers to explore the underlying materials themselves.
Data and information are subjected to rigorous analysis. We strive to identify underlying assumptions, potential biases, and different points of view on any given topic. Our goal is to provide context and nuance, not simple answers.
Policy impacts are examined from the perspectives of various stakeholders.
Historical events are considered within their broader socio-political and economic context.
When AI is used for summarization or analysis, it is clearly noted, and the AI's output is reviewed by human editors for accuracy and relevance.
All articles undergo a strict editorial process. This includes reviews for clarity, accuracy, impartiality, and completeness. Fact-checking is an integral part of our workflow.
Multiple rounds of review by editors with subject-matter expertise.
Verification of key facts, figures, dates, and quotes against reliable sources.
If errors occur, we are committed to correcting them promptly and transparently. We encourage our readers to contact us if they spot any inaccuracies.